<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Same difference?</title>
	<link>http://njjewishnews.com/justASC/2008/02/21/same-difference/</link>
	<description>A multilog with NJJN Editor-in-Chief Andrew Silow-Carroll</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wendy Greenspan</title>
		<link>http://njjewishnews.com/justASC/2008/02/21/same-difference/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy Greenspan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://njjewishnews.com/justASC/2008/02/21/same-difference/#comment-227</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this posting, and altho a week late, thank you for last week's column "Please forward to all of your friends!!"  It is crucial that we judge all of the candidates with factual, reliable information.  Left unchallenged, the mass e-mail smears against Obama (and other candidates) can only hurt the democratic process of choosing the best person to become president.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this posting, and altho a week late, thank you for last week&#8217;s column &#8220;Please forward to all of your friends!!&#8221;  It is crucial that we judge all of the candidates with factual, reliable information.  Left unchallenged, the mass e-mail smears against Obama (and other candidates) can only hurt the democratic process of choosing the best person to become president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
