RJC vs. NJDC
Tuesday, November 4th, 2008The National Jewish Democratic Council and the Republican Jewish Coalition trade last-second snipes over the NJDC’s support for Democratic challenger Jeanne Shaheen in th New Hampshire Senate race. The RJC calls the NJDC hypocrites for an e-mail blasting Republican incumbent John Sununu’s record on Israel — the NJDC, after all, has complained that the Republicans have been using Israel as a “wedge issue.”
But shouldn’t a distinction be drawn between messages that compare candidates’ records on Israel and those that compare entire parties? The NJDC message compares candidates, just as the RJC’s extensive ad buy focused (usually misleadingly, but that’s another argument) on Obama’s record. That’s in sharp contrast to the RJC’s ads of two years ago, when they suggested Joe Lieberman’s loss in the Conn. primary proved Democrats are weak on Israel, and other ads charged that Cindy Sheehan, Al Sharpton, and Jimmy Carter represent the Democratic mainstream.
Transforming Israel into a partisan issue has long been (or at least is supposed to be) a no-no among Jewish lobbyists, which is why most PACs try to stay nonpartisan and court friends on both sides of the aisle (as we are finding out at this very momment, you never know which party will be in a position to help or hurt Israel). Max Fisher, the “godfather” of Jewish Republicans as well as a giant among Jewish philanthropists, probably does a 360 in his grave whenever the RJC suggests the Democratic Party is no friend of Israel.
So the broad brush is bad. But if they can’t talk about candidates, what’s left for these affinity groups to do?

JustASC is written by Andrew Silow-Carroll, Editor-in-Chief of the 